Can anybody help?
The sangoma card is working flawlessly, and the wanpipe drivers run before Zaptel.
My client asked me to set them up with 8 FXS and 16 FXO ports. After reading the reviews, I bought a Xorcom Astribank.
I can see in /proc/xpp/ there are 3 spans getting detected, which makes sense…
But when I configure them in zaptel.conf like so:
[size=75]#Sangoma A104 port 1 [slot:4 bus:8 span: 1]
span=1,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=1-24
#Sangoma A104 port 2 [slot:4 bus:8 span: 2]
span=2,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=25-48
#Sangoma A104 port 3 [slot:4 bus:8 span: 3]
span=3,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=49-72
#Sangoma A104 port 4 [slot:4 bus:8 span: 4]
span=4,0,0,d4,ami
e&m=73-96
#Xorcom Astribank - 8 FXS + 5 Data Ports span 5
fxoks=97-110
#Xorcom Astribank - 8 FXO span 6
fxsks=111-118
#Xorcom Astribank - 8 FXO span 7
fxsks=119-126
[/size]
[size=100]
Zttool’s output shows the Sangoma spans appropriately, and Xorcom’s 1st and second span. The third span (7) doesn’t show up at all.
ztcfg -d shows this:
[/size]
[size=75]
Line 4: loadzone=us
Line 5: defaultzone=us
Line 8: span=1,0,0,d4,ami
Line 9: e&m=1-24
Line 12: span=2,0,0,d4,ami
Line 13: e&m=25-48
Line 16: span=3,0,0,d4,ami
Line 17: e&m=49-72
Line 20: span=4,0,0,d4,ami
Line 21: e&m=73-96
Line 23: fxoks=97-110
Line 24: fxsks=111-118
Line 25: fxsks=119-126
ZT_CHANCONFIG failed on channel 119: Invalid argument (22)
Did you forget that FXS interfaces are configured with FXO signalling
and that FXO interfaces use FXS signalling?
[/size]
[size=100]
No, I didn’t forget…the span isn’t registering! I’d try re-compiling zaptel but I’m concerned that sangoma’s wanrouter/wanpipe drivers are going to have to get recompiled and that this will bring me back to square 1.
I tried Xorcom’s live CD in a system without the Sangoma hardware and the cd detected and registered the Astribank spans properly.
I’ve been fighting with this for days now…any suggestions would be appreciated.
[/size]