I’m just wondering what people here think of Trixbox 1.11 compared to a pure Asterisk compiled from source setup?
Any and all thoughts or opinions are welcome, as I’m trying to decide which route to go.
I’m just wondering what people here think of Trixbox 1.11 compared to a pure Asterisk compiled from source setup?
Any and all thoughts or opinions are welcome, as I’m trying to decide which route to go.
well, trixbox is nice for a home user or someone who has a small business, but honestly, i have found that a vanilla install of asterisk with properly laid-out config files is MUCH easier to maintain when the user count climbs above about 5 people.
plus, it’s easier being able to edit anything you want on a console instead of having to leave existing code in place like you would with trixbox.
lastly, migrating a dialplan from machine to machine is a snap - i tarball my /etc/asterisk directory and copy it to another machine - bam - i have a new server.
maybe i’m not the best person to ask, because my experiences with front ends have been very limited - i’ve only dabbled in trixbox/AMP a bit.
that’s my $0.02, FWIW.
I prefer pure Asterisk, as you can make the configuration as simple as you want it. With Trixbox/FreePBX there is a lot of configuration which makes you jump from context to context or file to file to try and find something.
I would say Trixbox is good to learn asterisk with and make sense out of the entries you make into the GUI that it places into the config files, A@H even does this better because it puts configs in the appropriate files while trixbox puts SIP setup for example in sip_additional.conf instead of in sip.conf and the dialplan in extensions_additional.conf instead of in extensions.conf which can confuse a lot of beginners when move unto pure asterisk. I used A@H during my earlier times but now into pure asterisk which is much more eaier to work with (not to leran with due to higher learning curve than trixbox/A@H), it also makes it much easier to copy config files and setup a new server in a flash. It is also developed with larger installations in mind compared to trixbox/A@H.
With Trixbox it hide a lot of details for ease of operation. If you’re not thinking of any bells and whistles (or anything extraordinary feature) for your Asterisk…go with the Trixbox.