Along the some line of thinking as the “n” to avoid renumbering, let me make this suggestion. Current syntax is:
exten => 101,1,Answer( )
exten => 101,n,Wait,1
exten => 101,n,Playback(greeting)
exten => 101,n(startover),Background(instructions)
exten => 101,n,WaitExten
Why not do this?
exten => 101,1,Answer( )
next => Wait,1
next => Playback(greeting)
next => (startover) ,Background(instructions)
next => WaitExten
The idea is that the “next” term is like “exten” but it copies the extension from the last exten command and assumes “n” to increment the priority count.
Furthermore, why not allow multiple command on the same line?
exten => 101,1,Answer( )|Wait(1)|Playback(greeting)
