I have noticed that someone tried to call a long distance number. I have turned off allowguest. Does the log, below, suggest the attacker successfully registered as user 1001?
[Jul 9 19:56:16] NOTICE[27785][C-00000031] chan_sip.c: Call from ‘1001’ (88.150.240.85:5070) to extension ‘011441204894589’ rejected because extension not found in context ‘ld2-users’.
[Jul 9 19:56:22] WARNING[27785] chan_sip.c: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 71673ef1bc9058e0933f20e48435093c for seqno 1 (Critical Response) – See wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/ … nsmissions
Packet timed out after 6400ms with no response
[Jul 9 19:56:30] NOTICE[27785][C-00000032] chan_sip.c: Call from ‘1001’ (88.150.240.85:5070) to extension ‘9011441204894589’ rejected because extension not found in context ‘ld2-users’.
[Jul 9 19:56:36] WARNING[27785] chan_sip.c: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission 8085339b528605d2052068ad84c8a1a4 for seqno 1 (Critical Response) – See wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/ … nsmissions
Packet timed out after 6399ms with no response
[Jul 9 19:56:44] NOTICE[27785][C-00000033] chan_sip.c: Call from ‘1001’ (88.150.240.85:5070) to extension ‘8011441204894589’ rejected because extension not found in context ‘ld2-users’.
[Jul 9 19:56:51] WARNING[27785] chan_sip.c: Retransmission timeout reached on transmission f1b9cc40cef08014bdb5e6a1b2f959c4 for seqno 1 (Critical Response) – See wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/ … nsmissions
Packet timed out after 6399ms with no response
[Jul 9 20:26:24] NOTICE[27785][C-000000b0] chan_sip.c: Call from ‘1001’ (88.150.240.85:5071) to extension ‘011441204894589’ rejected because extension not found in context ‘ld2-users’.