# Does Page still require DAHDI?

**URL:** <https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057>\
**Category:** DAHDI\
**Created:** [February 22, 2026, 11:21pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057 "2026-02-22T23:21:27Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 5\
**Page:** 1

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dcunningham](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ea5d25/32.png) [@dcunningham](https://community.asterisk.org/u/dcunningham)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2026, 11:21pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057/1 "2026-02-22T23:21:27Z")

</div>

Does anyone know if the Page dialplan command still requires DAHDI (software, not hardware) for timing? Various online resources say it does, but it’s hard to tell whether they’re outdated. Thanks in advance.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![FrancoSmash](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/asterisk/user_avatar/community.asterisk.org/francosmash/32/6689_2.png) [@FrancoSmash](https://community.asterisk.org/u/FrancoSmash)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2026, 11:38pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057/2 "2026-02-22T23:38:50Z")

</div>

I install it regardless : [GitHub - FrancoSmash73/dahdi-linux-3.4.0: DAHDI Linux 3.4.0 with kernel 6.12 compatibility patches for Rocky Linux 10](https://github.com/FrancoSmash73/dahdi-linux-3.4.0)[GitHub - FrancoSmash73/dahdi-tools-3.4.0: DAHDI Tools 3.4.0 - Patched for Rocky Linux 10.x / modern autotools compatibility](https://github.com/FrancoSmash73/dahdi-tools-3.4.0)

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jcolp](https://sea1.discourse-cdn.com/asterisk/user_avatar/community.asterisk.org/jcolp/32/8848_2.png) [@jcolp](https://community.asterisk.org/u/jcolp)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2026, 11:43pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057/3 "2026-02-22T23:43:13Z")

</div>

Page was moved to using ConfBridge underneath in 2012. If ConfBridge works, then Page will work.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![dcunningham](https://avatars.discourse-cdn.com/v4/letter/d/ea5d25/32.png) [@dcunningham](https://community.asterisk.org/u/dcunningham)\
**Post date:** [February 22, 2026, 11:46pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057/4 "2026-02-22T23:46:42Z")

</div>

Thank you Joshua. We’ve been using ConfBridge for a long time, but kept installing DAHDI in the belief that it was required for Page. Glad I asked!

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://global.discourse-cdn.com/asterisk/original/2X/4/475d0c889911cfb84ac4881ad6df8b523e3f9105.png) [@system](https://community.asterisk.org/u/system)\
**Post date:** [March 25, 2026, 11:46pm UTC](https://community.asterisk.org/t/does-page-still-require-dahdi/112057/5 "2026-03-25T23:46:57Z")

</div>

This topic was automatically closed 31 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.
